|
Underfloor Heating (UFH)
Space
heating energy use constitutes a major proportion of total UK primary
energy consumption - at least 60% for example in the domestic sector.
Despite improvements in energy efficiency (better insulation etc) energy
use in our homes is increasing. The number of homes is increasing
too and we keep our home warmer than we ever used to (average 16oC
in 1990 rising to 18oC in 2004). So how do we maintain
this drive for more and more comfort whilst reducing our energy burden -
is UFH the answer?
UFH comes in two forms - wet and electric.
Lets look at wet systems first - fed by the circulation of hot water
through pipes under floors. These systems warm the floor structure
by conduction causing the surface to radiate heat into the space above
and the primary source of heat is typically a boiler - although many
other options now apply which i will deal with later. The boiler
heats water to 40-50oC and this is distributed in plastic
pipes to one or more manifolds each of which comprises a flow and return
header from which loops are taken to serve areas of the building to be
heated. In a simple two-storey office for example there would be
one manifold serving the ground floor and one for the first each feeding
UFH loops in the individual rooms on that floor.
Getting good conduction between the UFH loops and the floor structure is
the key to success. Different methods of transferring heat from the
pipes are applied for different floor structures. The pipes are
usually fixed to the floor insulation and a concrete screed poured over
them further to which floor tiles, carpets or other surface finishes are
applied. Where floor tiles are used heat radiates into the
"treated space" at roughly 100W/m2. The design output
achievable with suspended timber floors averages slightly lower at 70W/m2.
Note the use of the word radiate - UFH is more akin to radiant heating
than is for example the use of radiators which are mostly convection.
Radiant heat means less rising heat lost to the roof void as convection
- indeed with UFH the reverse is probably true - that is temperature
inversion where the floor is hotter than the ceiling.
All of this means that the boiler operates at a lower temperature which
promotes good combustion increasing efficiency. Typically a
condensing boiler serving UFH would be operating at 90% compared to 87%
for the same boiler feeding radiators.
These low operating temperatures also means that UFH is the ideal
partner for "renewables" such as ground source heat pumps and air source
heat pumps (where the heat exchanger carried out an air to water
transfer). Why ideal - well simply these systems tend only to be
capable of heating water to 40-50oC and although some people
like to boost this with a small boiler or an electric immersion element
it seems a bit daft to me so I prefer to use the water at the
temperature the heat pumps produces it in UFH systems - but heck what do
I know?
|
Pro's and Con's of Under
Floor Heating |
|
Pro's |
Cons' |
| Lower running costs
and CO2 emissions |
Slower response
time |
| Optimises thermal
comfort |
Heat output limited
to 100W/m2 |
| Enhances decor by
concealing heating |
Supplementary
heating may be required in small rooms & bathrooms with two external
walls, small conservatories and corridors with large glazed areas |
| Flexible for use
with renewables and CHP |
Remains a "novel"
technology, despite recent growth which tends to lead to
uncompetitive pricing |
| Ease of access to
manifolds for maintenance |
Can restrict floor
finish |
| Concealed heat
emitters improve access for cleaning floors and skirtings |
Pumps can be noisy
so need sound damping or remote siting to avoid nuisance to
occupiers |
| Enhances property
value |
Deep floor required
to accommodate pipework and insulation |
| Common on continent
- becoming more popular in UK |
Not really much of
an option for existing properties unless flooring is being replaced |
| Extended warranty
of up to 25 years available on pipework loops of most UFH systems |
Risk of damaging
pipework if flooring is penetrated, leading to potentially costly
repair works |
Conclusions: if you are building a new
property then potentially great in terms of using new renewable
technology. Initially expensive in terms of material costs and
requires specialist labour (not just any old plumber can fit this stuff)
but long term your running costs are likely to be substantially lower
than with traditional boiler fed systems.
|